Share This Page

High school roundup: Summit Academy takes 3rd in Allegheny with victory

| Saturday, Oct. 26, 2013, 7:45 p.m.

Summit Academy (5-4, 4-3), a first-time WPIAL playoff participant, secured third place in the Allegheny Conference with a 38-20 victory over Freeport on Saturday. Elijah Hardy and Nate Cofer scored two touchdowns apiece for the Knights.

Andrew Romanchak completed 23 passes for the Yellowjackets, who finished at 2-7, 2-6.

Springdale 28, Riverview 0 — At Riverside Park in Oakmont, Springdale (3-6, 3-5) broke a three-game losing streak with its most complete performance of the year in the regular-season finale against cross-river rival Riverview (1-8, 1-7).

Freshman quarterback Sammy Carey ran for two touchdowns, junior tight end Adam Lock caught a 32-yard touchdown pass from junior receiver Mike Banachoski and sophomore running back Joel Wunnenberg also scored for the Dynamos.

Springdale used 10 ball carriers, led by junior Austin Kline, who ran for 88 yards on 23 carries. The Dynamos outgained Riverview, 320-101.

OLSH 28, Wilkinsburg 12 — Ryan Theobald returned an interception 30 yards for a touchdown as OLSH (5-4, 4-4) forced four turnovers in its nonconference win over Wilkinsburg (2-7, 2-6). Tom Marra paced OLSH's offense with 11 rushing attempts for 74 yards and two touchdowns. Marcus Williams ran 19 times for 110 yards and a touchdown for Wilkinsburg.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.