ShareThis Page

'Same' Lancers await Hounds

| Friday, Nov. 8, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Jim Ference/The Valley Independent
Monessen's Clintell Gillaspie, shown in last year's playoff game against Neshannock, will be called on to have another big game against the Lancers tonight.
Monessen offensive linemen like Raealo Davis (57) and Jonathan Kravets (66) hope to create plenty of running room for running back Clintell Gillaspie (with ball) Nov. 8, 2013, against Neshannock.

A year ago, the Monessen Greyhounds came within seconds of reaching the WPIAL Class A semifinals in their tough 24-21 loss to Neshannock in the quarterfinals.

The teams get together again at 7:30 p.m. today at Chartiers-Houston, and while Monessen coach Andy Pacak has had enough game tape from this season to judge the Lancers (8-2), he doesn't have to look much further than last year's game tape to get a good read on tonight's opponent.

“They really are pretty much the same team we played last year,” Pacak said. “They have a lot of the same skill people and the whole line is back. We're pretty much preparing for the same team, the same scheme.

“And like last year, it's a good team with a good scheme. They have the same thing that I like to think we have: three or four kids on offense who can absolutely kill you on any given play.”

Pacak said that while Lancers quarterback Ernie Burkes and running back Eli Owens appear on paper to be the top guns, his chief concern comes from the Lancers' offensive and defensive lines.

“They are pretty solid up there with a lot of veteran guys back,” he said. “Their line concerns me. We're going to need our guys up front on offense and defense to do their best to control the line of scrimmage.”

Defensively, Pacak said the plan for the Greyhounds is simple against the Lancers' spread offense.

“Everybody has to maintain their area on defense and not go chasing and get out of position because that is when they will cut back and kill you,” Pacak said. “They do things to try and get you out of position and take advantage of that. We have to be disciplined on defense.”

Pacak also knows another way to thwart a spread offense.

“It's been said time and time again that the best defense is to control the ball on offense,” he said. “All year long, we have been such a big-play team, getting things done in huge chunks. But all week, I've been telling our guys that getting four, five yards at a time this time of year is a good thing. That's the way to get things done.

“Controlling the ball and finishing drives will serve us well at this time of the year.”

The Greyhounds have the kind of attack that could be capable of controlling the football with the running back tandem of Clintell Gillaspie and Javon Brown. While Gillaspie (10.0) and Brown (8.5) both have large per carry averages, Pacak knows those numbers will be tested against a defense like Neshannock's.

Still, there is recipe for success there.

“Clintell and Javon are both talented backs. They are seniors. This is what they have worked all season for — what we all worked all season for,” Pacak said. “They have what it takes to get the job done.

“It's just a matter of doing it.”

The winner of tonight's game will get the winner of No. 2 North Catholic (10-0) and No. 7 Avonworth (9-1) in the semifinals.

PRE-GAME NOTES: The Greyhounds have only made the semifinals once in Pacak's 10 years, despite going to the playoffs nine times ... Pacak said his team is as healthy as it has been all season going into the game ... Pacak said a key to the game could be the Greyhounds' kick and punt return teams in establishing field position.

Jeff Oliver is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2666 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.