Tribune-Review Q&A: Franklin Regional's Colin Jonov
By Kevin Gorman
Published: Thursday, Nov. 14, 2013, 10:15 p.m.
colin Jonov likes to get his hands on the ball, and he doesn't care whether it's on offense or defense. The 5-foot-10, 175-pound senior wide receiver-cornerback who has committed to play at Bucknell leads Franklin Regional with 20 receptions for 364 yards and six touchdowns and six interceptions for the Panthers (10-1), who play defending champion West Allegheny (11-0) Friday in the WPIAL Class AAA semifinals.
Q: What's it like to be one game from Heinz Field?
A: It's an awesome feeling to be back here. Our sophomore year, we were here and played Knoch. We're hoping for a different outcome.
Q: Did this team believe it could get this far?
A: This was supposed to be our down year. All the guys in the locker room knew we had something special. We knew we were going to go far and had to keep it rolling.
Q: What is your favorite football memory so far?
A: It has to be our fourth-down stop against West Mifflin to clinch the game. It was fourth-and-1 on our own 35. They handed off to Jimmy Wheeler, and we made a tackle in the backfield. We all went crazy celebrating, then took a knee and ran out the clock.
Q: What do you remember about the 2005 team?
A: I remember that like it was yesterday, going to the WPIAL championship and state championship game with a bunch of kids on our team now. That was the same year we went undefeated. I remember telling each other back then that we were going to do that.
Q: How much do you think about the stakes?
A: It's crazy to think about it. Our class is just so determined to win this game and get to Heinz that most of us haven't thought about losing. It's a scary thought, to think that if we lose this game, it will be the last high school game we'll ever play.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.