WPIAL Class AA semifinal preview: Aliquippa vs. Beaver
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2013, 10:09 p.m.
class AA SEMIFINALS
No . 1 Aliquippa (11-0) vs. No. 12 Beaver (8-3)
7:30 p.m. Friday at Ambridge
After pulling off upset wins over fifth-seeded Shady Side Academy and fourth-seeded Mt. Pleasant to reach the Class AA semifinals, Beaver coach Jeff Beltz has mixed feelings about his team's underdog persona.
“Being the underdog is a fun role,” Beltz said. “But it also means that maybe we didn't play as well as we could have early in the season.”
The semifinal matchup against top-seeded Aliquippa is a rematch of the final Midwestern Conference game three weeks ago. In a dominant win, Aliquippa held Beaver to a season-low 13 points while scoring 50. Alex Rowse, the WPIAL's leading passer, also had his worst game, throwing for just 110 yards on 9-for-27 passing.
But neither team is expecting the game to be as lopsided this time around.
“Both (Beltz) and I know that everything snowballed early on,” Aliquippa coach Mike Zmijanac said, “and we got every break in the world in the first quarter.”
Not counting the loss to Aliquippa, Beaver is averaging more than 42 points per game. For Beaver to pull off yet another upset, ball security will be the key.
“We turned the ball over on our first two offensive plays, and before you know it we're down 21-0 early and momentum was clearly in their favor in that football game,” Beltz said. “We can quickly point back to the last time we played, and if we turn the football over, we'll lose again.”
Even with the history between the two teams, Beaver is the next roadblock on the way to back-to-back Class AA championships for Aliquippa.
“It's the next game,” Zmijanac said. “We're playing a team that made it to the semifinals. It doesn't matter who they are.”
— Gary Horvath
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.