Redbank Valley defense knows it must stop Curwensville ground attack
By Matt Grubba
Published: Friday, Nov. 15, 2013, 12:56 a.m.
There aren't many secrets about what lies in Redbank Valley's path to the District 9 final.
The No. 3 Bulldogs will be tasked with stopping running back Zach Tibbens and the power running game of No. 2 Curwensville in the early D-9, Class A semifinal at 1 p.m. Saturday at DuBois High School.
Redbank Valley (7-3) is seeking its first D-9 title game appearance since moving to Class A — its last final was the Class AA game in 2004 — while Curwensville (9-1) was the Class A champ in 2010.
The winner of that game will face the winner between No. 1 Clarion and No. 4 Brockway, who meet on the same field at 6 p.m. Saturday, next week for the district championship.
A first look at the film or the stat sheet gives a clear indication of the Golden Tide's intentions entering a game. Of 3,273 yards of offense this year, 2,126 of them are rushing yards by Tibbens, a 180-pound senior back.
“It seems like an obvious point that we need to stop him, but everyone they play has said the same thing, and only one team has done a good job of it,” Redbank Valley coach Ed Wasilowski said. “They're an old throwback, I-formation team. It's like the old Green Bay Packers — here we come, try and stop us.”
As a product of the team's run-heavy scheme and leading in most games — Curwensville's lone loss was to Class AA finalist Kane — quarterback Kyle Johns has attempted just 54 passes all season with 26 completions. With that in mind, the focus of the Bulldogs' defense has been on slowing the running game.
“Stopping the run is the key, because they don't really pass at all,” senior running back/linebacker Mark Strothers said. “They're pretty straightforward with what they do, but the problem could be their line, because they're bigger than most the teams we've faced.”
The Bulldogs will counter with a more balanced attack that includes a run game led by Strothers. Despite missing two games with a hand injury, Strothers has run for 1,154 yards and a school-record 22 touchdowns this season, including 156 in the quarterfinal win over Ridgway last week.
Junior quarterback Jake Dougherty has thrown for 1,547 yards for Redbank Valley, which will be sticking to its offensive philosophy whether ahead or behind in the game.
“We've been very pleased with our production,” Wasilowski said. “We just take what the defense gives us. That's been our philosophy for years, it just so happened that last week, we ran the ball more, and it's never a bad thing to get the ball in Mark Strothers' hands.”
Strothers, meanwhile, is prepared to do what it takes so that next week, he can get carries in a championship game.
“It's whatever works. I just want to win, no matter who gets the ball,” Strothers said. “We're all pretty pumped because it's a chance to make our first single-A final.”
The Saturday kickoff is a first this season for Redbank Valley, while Curwensville played one Saturday game earlier this season at Elk County Catholic.
The slight change to the weekly schedule doesn't affect much, according to Wasilowski, and Strothers said it might even be a benefit for such a big game.
“It still feels like another week, but it feels like we got a lot more done. We're prepared more,” Strothers said. “We have a few different defensive looks in, and we're ready to play.”
Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @Grubba_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.