Share This Page

Allderdice no match for Erie McDowell in PIAA Class AAAA sub-regional

| Friday, Nov. 15, 2013, 11:03 p.m.

Even though it was a heavy underdog, Allderdice showed early on it wasn't going to roll over.

However, the strength in numbers and talent of Erie McDowell wore down Allderdice, as the Dragons lost, 49-19, in a PIAA Class AAAA sub-regional at Cupples Stadium.

Allderdice (5-6) struck first as sophomore quarterback James Jackson threw a 37-yard touchdown pass to twin brother Timothy Jackson for a 6-0 lead in the first quarter.

But Allderdice wasn't able to stop the option offense of Erie McDowell (6-5), as the Trojans scored 35 unanswered points in the first half.

“You have to look at where we made our mistakes. We made four or five mistakes within the 20-yard line,” Allderdice coach Jerry Haslett said. “If we didn't make those mistakes, we felt like we were able to hang in with this team even though they might be bigger and stronger. But we were throwing the ball all over the place.”

Erie McDowell senior running back Jamie Szymczak ran for two touchdowns, and caught a 38-yard pass from senior quarterback Cameron Spadacene.

Trojan senior running back Tyree Spearman added a 17-yard touchdown run in the first.

Allderdice went into the locker room on a good note as the Jackson twins connected, on their birthday, on a 13-yard touchdown pass to make it 35-12 McDowell at the break.

The Dragons will welcome back the Jackson twins next year as they bid to return to the state playoffs.

“I was proud of how my kids played,” Haslett said. “They have kept playing all year. They made a pact with each other that they won't back down. We expect to be back here next year with the young kids returning.”

Erie McDowell will move onto face Mifflin County in the PIAA Class AAAA playoffs.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.