Homer-Center storms to District 6-A crown
ALTOONA — Homer-Center completed just one pass in the District 6-A championship game, but it was all the Wildcats needed.
Trailing 12-8 with 4:19 to play, Homer-Center faced a fourth-and-3 at midfield.
Aaron Berezansky connected with Ean Lee over the middle for a 10-yard gain and a first down. Two plays later, Lee scored on an 11-yard run to give the Wildcats the lead.
Homer-Center finished off its run to district gold with a 22-12 victory over Bishop Guilfoyle on Saturday night on a snow-covered field at Altoona's Mansion Park.
Two plays after Lee's go-ahead touchdown, Shawn Steffee tackled BG's Brandon Chadbourne in the end zone for a safety.
Berezansky sealed the win on the Wildcats' ensuing possession with an 11-yard touchdown run.
Prior to taking the lead, Homer-Center did little in the second half, gaining 20 yards and collecting zero first downs.
Lee finished the game with 83 yards and two touchdowns on 18 carries.
After Bishop Guilfoyle struck first on DJ Kitt's 74-yard touchdown run, Homer-Center took advantage of a Marauders special teams gaffe that led to an 8-6 lead.
Lucas Monko pounced on a fumble at the Bishop Guilfoyle 34. Seven plays later, Lee scored on a 1-yard run. Mike Newhouse's two-point run on the conversion attempt gave the Wildcats the lead.
BG took a 12-8 lead later in the second quarter on a 16-yard touchdown on a swing pass from Chadbourne to Sam McCloskey.
Jon Fleck is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.