Gateway football coach Militzer won't return
By Chris Harlan
Published: Monday, Dec. 2, 2013, 6:51 p.m.
Told that other candidates would be interviewed for his job, Gateway football coach Donnie Militzer has decided he will not reapply.
Militzer, who took over the program amid turmoil, said Monday he made his decision after meeting with principal William Short and athletic director Randy Rovesti. The Gators were 8-3 and reached the WPIAL Class AAAA quarterfinals in his one season as coach.
“I'm proud of the way I handled this because it wasn't an easy situation,” Militzer said. “I never did anything to embarrass the program or the kids, and I'm proud of the job I did.”
Militzer replaced longtime coach Terry Smith, who left Gateway for a position at Temple University and filed a complaint with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Gateway's school board renews all coaching contracts on an annual basis, said Rovesti, who considered questions about Militzer's status as “premature.”
Gateway's three losses all were to playoff qualifiers, including a 27-21 quarterfinal loss to eventual WPIAL champion Central Catholic.
“It's disappointing because I felt we had things moving in a positive direction,” Militzer said.
Kevin Gorman contributed. Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.