Geibel won't field varsity football team next season
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Plagued by low numbers and an inability to field a complete roster on a regular basis, Geibel has decided it will not attempt to play a WPIAL varsity football schedule during the 2014 and 2015 seasons. However, this does not mean there won't be football at Geibel.
“We're going to play,” Geibel athletic director Shawn Holup said. “We were allowed by the WPIAL to play an independent schedule. So that means we can play junior varsity teams and other teams looking for opponents. We feel this is the best option for the next two years.”
Holup reported that it is too early to tell how many games Geibel will be able to play during the upcoming season. Holup did note that Geibel will be looking for teams, even from out of state, to help create some form of schedule for the next two seasons.
The Gators are hoping that keeping the football program alive in some form over the course of the next two high school seasons will help stimulate the program. The hope is that Geibel can become a competitive WPIAL program in the future.
“(WPIAL executive director) Tim O'Malley allowed us to do this and that was a positive development,” Holup said. “Hopefully, we'll be able to build some interest and we'll see where we are in two years.”
Holup estimates that 15 to 17 students have shown interest in playing football for the coming seasons.
Geibel forfeited games to Beth-Center, Jefferson-Morgan and West Greene in 2013. The Gators also forfeited to Frazier and Beth-Center in 2012.
Geibel alerted the WPIAL before the PIAA released enrollment classification figures Monday, which is why the WPIAL planned for 24 teams Class A.
Jason Black is the local sports editor of the Daily Courier. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.