Bloom signs letter of intent to UConn
Photo by Bill Pribisco | for the Ligonier Echo
Poor weather conditions couldn't deter Alec Bloom last week from signing his letter of intent to play football at the University of Connecticut.
A three-sport letterman standing at 6'6”, 235 pounds, Bloom's focused on football his junior year. In his senior year he snagged 45 receptions for 830 yards and 12 touchdowns. He also rushed for 79 yards and a score.
Making his verbal commitment days before last season's football summer camp opened, Bloom weathered a season-ending knee injury in week eight, a head coaching change at the university, some high-pressured sales pitches from other D1 schools and a winter storm that cancelled schools the day of his official signing.
“We still had the signing, despite school being cancelled,” said Ligonier Valley School District Athletic Director Thomas Kayda. “This was important for Alec his family and the school.”
After the event, Bloom faxed his letter to the Huskies coaching staff.
Offensive Coordinator Mike Cummings beamed when he received Bloom's faxed paperwork, featured on the team's online video. “Alec Bloom is a tremendous athlete,” he stated. “He can high point the ball, catch 50-50 balls ones that can go either way, long stride quickly and block well in space and at the point of attack,” Cummings said.
“Alec is a unique D1 athlete and a great get for UConn,” said Kayda.
He was named to Pennsylvania Sportswriters Class AA All-State Team and earned a spot on the USA Today All-Pennsylvania team. He made all local newspapers' teams and was selected to represent Pennsylvania in the Big 33 Classic on June 14 in Hershey.
UConn Head Coach Bob Diaco talked to Bloom after the signing and said, “This is going to be a 40- or 50-year decision, one that will serve you everyday of your life.”
Spencer Sadler is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.