Share This Page

HS Buzz: PIAA board will hear Sto-Rox appeal March 20

| Saturday, Feb. 15, 2014, 10:10 p.m.

Sto-Rox administrators will meet with the PIAA Board of Directors on March 20 to discuss the enrollment numbers submitted by the district, athletic director Howard Bullard said.

The PIAA numbers released in January moved Sto-Rox to Class AA football. The school, which has said its numbers were flawed, would like to return to Class A, where it was the WPIAL football runner-up the past three seasons.

Bullard declined to discuss how the numbers were submitted incorrectly.

Every two years, the PIAA requires its schools to submit updated enrollment figures for grades 9-11 by Oct. 15. Schools have 30 days to correct any errors. Sto-Rox did not take action until after classification parameters were released in January.

“They had the opportunity to correct whatever they submitted up to Nov. 15,” PIAA executive director Bob Lombardi said. “I don't know what the board will do.”

However, Northern Lehigh School District approached the PIAA in January with a similar dilemma, and the board allowed the school's enrollment numbers to be changed.

“A member school has the opportunity to appeal anything in the bylaws that they feel has been done incorrectly,” Lombardi said. “Whether it's an adverse decision of eligibility or a filing process.”

The WPIAL already has released football conferences and schedules for next season with Sto-Rox in Class AA.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.