Deer Lakes loses football coach to Northgate
Discouraging times continue for the Deer Lakes football program.
The coach Deer Lakes hired in January 2013 to turn its struggling football program around, T.J. Wiley, finished his first season winless. The district opened its head football coach position Monday night at about the same time Northgate approved Wiley as its new coach — the same program that Wiley coached in 2011-12, and then left in 2013 to lead the Lancers.
“I was up front with (Deer Lakes athletic director) Chuck (Bellisario) about the whole thing, and he said, ‘Just keep me posted,' ” Wiley said. “I've always loved Northgate. ... I never thought the Northgate thing was going to come about again. I didn't apply anywhere else. It was only Northgate. I wasn't sniffing around.”
Wiley, whose head coaching career started with a one-season stint at Penn-Trafford and continued with a 10-9 record at Northgate, cited a commute from his job in Robinson Township to West Deer — one he said that lasted more than an hour and 20 minutes because of road construction — as a key reason to leave Deer Lakes and return to the Flames.
“I wasn't there enough, and I wasn't feeling (like I was) a part of it,” Wiley said of Deer Lakes, a school that appealed to him because of its proximity to his home. “This has nothing to do with the record. I just felt like I was doing a disservice by not being around.”
Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.