Gateway pair selected for all-star game
The rosters for the Pennsylvania State Football Coaches Association's East-West All-Star Game have been released and Gateway seniors Delvon Randall and Zaihe Regus are on the West team for the May 4 contest at Franklin Regional High School.
As a senior for the Gators this past fall, Randall was all over the field and led the offensive in receptions with 50 for 775 yards and seven touchdowns.
He added three rushing scores and threw for two more.
Defensively, Randall made 46 tackles (38 solo), intercepted a pass and forced three fumbles.
Gateway went 8-3 overall, 6-2 in the Quad East and made the quarterfinals of the WPIAL playoffs
Regus, a third-team Quad-A all-state selection by the Pennsylvania Football News, set a school record with 148 tackles (76 solo) in 2013.
He had 10 tackles for a loss and added two interceptions, two forced fumbles and five fumble recoveries.�
Randall and Regus are slated to both play defense in the East-West game — Randall at defensive back and Regus at linebacker.
The Gateway duo are two of 21 players from the WPIAL on the West team.
Other local players on picked for the squad are McKeesport running back Allen Wright, West Mifflin running back Jimmy Wheeler, McKeesport offensive lineman Tom McKelvey, Penn Hills defensive back Mike Anthony, Franklin Regional defensive back Colin Jonov, Penn Hills defensive back Shawn Featherstone and McKeesport linebacker Carlos Hudson.
Michael Love is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5825, at email@example.com or via Twitter at Mlove_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.