Share This Page

Replacing Manack key for Frazier

| Thursday, Aug. 21, 2014, 8:55 p.m.
Barry Reeger | Trib Total Media
Frazier's Nathaniel Zurich carries during a practice session on Monday, Aug. 11, 2014 in Perryopolis.
Barry Reeger | Trib Total Media
Frazier running back Nick Smalich carries during a practice session on Monday, Aug. 11, 2014 in Perryopolis.

When Mike Steeber was hired as Frazier's coach in 2010, making the playoffs was a worthy goal.

After all, he was taking over a program that had not made the WPIAL playoffs since 2002 and had not seen a .500 record since 1999. But in the past four seasons, the Commodores have gone 26-10 with three playoff appearances — all first-round exits.

“The expectation at this point is beyond simply making the playoffs,” Steeber said. “Obviously, we want to secure a playoff berth first before looking past the first round, and I think the kids understand that. But the kids are past the point where a loss in the first round is acceptable.”

If Frazier is to exceed last season's 7-3 mark in the Tri-County South, it will have to find a way to replace graduate Charlie Manack, who threw for 3,590 yards and 48 touchdowns in his two seasons as a starter.

“That's the challenge,” Steeber said. “We lost a number of key seniors from last season, but Charlie was a special player and our offense leaned heavily on him.”

The Commodores also must replace last year's top receiving threat, Dakota Hixson, leading tackler Zach Mastowski, and Chaise Bertocci, a starter at running back and linebacker who missed a majority of last season with a knee injury.

On the bright side, seniors Nick Smalich and Ethan Weiser and sophomore Alvin Ross saw plenty of action filling in for Bertocci, giving Frazier a solid core of experienced running backs. Senior Nathaniel Zurich, a third-team all-state selection at tight end, was second on the team with 29 receptions and led the squad with nine touchdown catches. He's also a three-year starter at outside linebacker.

“We have a number of good backs returning,” Steeber said, “so we will need to determine if we have to depend on the ground game this year or if we have someone capable of running the passing game that we displayed the past few seasons.”

Steeber mentioned junior Hunter Patterson — a two-year starter at receiver — and sophomore Christopher Pierce as possible replacements for Manack.

On the offensive line, starters Joey Horvath and Darren Osborne return, and Steeber mentioned Cameron Roebuck and Bret Poling as returning impact players defensively.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.