ShareThis Page

HSFB preview by position: The spread is spreading for quarterbacks

| Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
Christopher Horner | Trib Total Media
South Fayette quarterback Brett Brumbaugh throws a pass during practice July 31, 2014.
randy jarosz | for the south hills record
Seton-La Salle junior Tyler Perone (12)
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Seneca Valley's T.J. Holl is a member of the 2013 Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Terrific 25.
Guy Wathen | Tribune-Review
Ringgold's Nico Law is a member of the 2013 Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Terrific 25.
Lou Raggiunti | For the Tribune-Review
Pine-Richland’s Ben Dinucci works out during practice Tuesday, Aug. 13, 2013, at Pine-Richland.
Christopher Horner | Trib Total Media
Peters Twp. quarterback Cory Owen

Not long ago, high school coaches settled for a quarterback who could throw or run.

Now, many want one who does both.

With pass-oriented spread offenses now the rage on Friday nights, dual-threat quarterbacks are in style.

The trend that changed college football and the NFL has influenced high school offenses. Ringgold's Nico Law and Seneca Valley's T.J. Holl are good examples. Both are as capable with their legs as with their arms.

Yet, even in this read-option revolution, there's room for some pocket passers like South Fayette's Brett Brumbaugh. He won WPIAL and PIAA Class AA titles as a drop-back passer.

Brumbaugh's 3,917 passing yards were the most in one season by any WPIAL quarterback.

But no matter the style, passing numbers have risen in general.

There were 41 quarterbacks in the WPIAL and City League with more than 1,000 passing yards last season and seven had more than 2,000.

As the spread spreads, those numbers could continue to climb.

Chris Harlan is staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

1. Brett Brumbaugh

South Fayette, sr., 6-4, 200

Brumbaugh soon could be the WPIAL's leader in career passing yards. He needs about 1,200 more. He had 41 touchdowns and 3,917 yards last season, breaking a single-season yardage record set in 2010 by his brother Christian. Akron and Temple have offered scholarships.

2. Ben DiNucci

Pine-Richland, sr., 6-3, 185

An accurate passer who fits well in Pine-Richland's spread offense, DiNucci was sixth among WPIAL quarterbacks last season with 2,147 yards and threw 15 touchdowns. He completed 72 percent of his throws (169 of 235). He verbally committed to Penn this month.

3. T.J. Holl

Seneca Valley, sr., 6-1, 205

A two-way starter who'll also play safety or linebacker, Holl was his team's leading passer and rusher last season. He ranked seventh among WPIAL passers with 2,145 yards and rushed for more than 700, helping Seneca Valley reach the WPIAL Class AAAA quarterfinals. Colgate offered him a scholarship.

4. Tyler Perone

Seton-La Salle, sr., 6-3, 195

As a first-year starter, Perone passed for 2,322 yards and 24 touchdowns last season. His yardage puts him second only to Brumbaugh among returning WPIAL quarterbacks. He had 340 yards and four touchdowns in a Class AA first-round playoff victory.

5. Nico Law

Ringgold, sr., 6-1, 180

A dangerous dual-threat quarterback, Law both rushed and passed for more than 1,000 yards last season. And he needed just nine games to accomplish the feat. Law finished the year with 1,494 passing yards and 1,210 rushing yards. He threw 14 touchdowns and ran for 15, more proof of his balance.

One to watch: Cory Owen

Peters Township, sr., 6-2, 195

The dual-threat quarterback holds scholarships from Buffalo, Toledo and others. He passed for only 501 yards and one touchdown last season, but ran for 762 yards and 10 touchdowns on 78 carries.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.