Gorman: Cardinal Wuerl North Catholic's Fulmore a triple threat
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Not often does a player rank among the WPIAL's top five rushers as a sophomore, only to be moved out of the backfield by his senior season.
P.J. Fulmore takes it as a compliment.
The Cardinal Wuerl North Catholic star ran for 1,820 yards as a sophomore tailback, then quarterbacked the Trojans to WPIAL and PIAA Class A championships as a junior last season.
Now the 5-foot-7, 180-pound senior will add receiver to his repertoire. He could line up anywhere from wildcat quarterback to tailback to the slot.
“Right now that's the plan,” North Catholic coach Bob Ravenstahl said. “If we just had him playing running back, he'd be one of the top choices. He's one of the most versatile guys in the WPIAL.”
The Trojans return quarterback Adam Sharlow, who was lost to a torn ACL in Week 7, as well as 1,100-yard rusher Jerome Turner, a senior.
“I just like having the ball in my hands,” said Fulmore, who has made a verbal commitment to Duquesne. “I'll play anywhere. I just like being on the field.”
Fulmore ran for 1,213 yards and 14 touchdowns and passed for 388 yards and three scores last year. But he starred in the slot at seven-on-seven camps, which prompted North Catholic to consider splitting him wide.
“A lot of teams had trouble covering him,” Ravenstahl said. “He's a great receiver. He's just very difficult to defend. He has great leaping ability and obviously great hands, and once he catches the ball, he's a threat as a runner.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.