Ryan Podgorski has played every position on the offensive line, from left tackle to left guard to long snapper.
The South Park star doesn't have a preference on a position.
“Wherever,” Podgorski said. “I'm versatile.”
Where most colleges want him as a tackle, South Park coach Tom Loughran thinks Podgorski's future is as an interior lineman.
“He's a great long snapper,” Loughran said. “He can regular snap and shotgun snap. He definitely can be a center.”
Although the 6-foot-5, 265-pounder will play defensive tackle this season, Podgorski believes his future is on offense.
“Because I like to punish people,” Podgorski said. “I like to be mean, to finish my blocks, finish the second level, also.”
Podgorski doesn't just talk tough. He looks the part, too, with a mohawk haircut.
Podgorski has scholarship offers from Akron, Bowling Green, Western Michigan and Robert Morris. He's also received interest from Pitt, which is worried that he isn't heavy enough to play on the line.
“They've got weight rooms down there, right?” Loughran joked. “In that respect, he reminds me of Reggie Wells. He didn't have the body weight they were looking for, but I said, ‘This kid can play.' Reggie's much more athletic, but that's not to downplay Ryan.”
Wells grew into a 300-pounder at Clarion, where he was a two-time Division II All-American. He played eight seasons in the NFL.
Podgorski, who recently turned 17, has room for growth.
“He should only be going into his junior year,” Loughran said. “When he came in as a freshman, he was big and awkward. He's just worked hard to get better and keeps improving.”
If Podgorski's progress continues, it will be bad news for his foes.
Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.