The running joke at Woodland Hills is about the player wearing No. 6.
He's big, strong and fast. He's all over the field. He makes every tackle in every practice.
And he's only getting better.
Who wears No. 6?
“Everybody does,” said Daniel Gibson, a 6-foot-3, 265-pound senior defensive tackle. “We've only had five WPIAL titles. We're going for six.”
Nonetheless, Gibson stood out in Woody High's scrimmage with Butler on Saturday. Not just because his sleeves were rolled up to expose his shoulder pads but rather for his disruptive play on a defensive line with the potential to be the WPIAL's best.
“If we win the battle up front,” Gibson said, “that sets the tone for the rest of the game.”
The Wolverines return three-year starters in Gibson and Kevin Solomon at defensive tackle, as well as senior ends Akira McClean and Will Fletcher.
“It sets up the whole defense really well,” said McClean, who had 14 sacks last season. “Woodland Hills has traditionally had a strong defensive line, and that's what we bring this year.”
What the Wolverines have in abundance is defensive line depth and experience. Senior Jaymier Scarborough, a 310-pound McKeesport transfer, is joined by junior tackles Amon Baldwin-Youngblood (6-4, 325) and Wilford Clark (6-1, 292) and end Steve Puhl (6-4, 215), a Franklin Regional transfer.
“We expect them to be good,” Woodland Hills coach George Novak said. “This group is up there with the best of them.”
Which will be a key in Woody High's quest for six.
Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.