Dane Jackson is one of the most dynamic dual-threat quarterbacks in the WPIAL, with a reputation for running to daylight, if not paydirt.
The Quaker Valley star kept opponents guessing by rushing for 1,111 yards and 10 touchdowns and passing for 975 yards and 13 touchdowns as a junior.
“It makes it hard for a lot of defenses,” Jackson said, “because they don't know whether you're going to pass or run.”
But Jackson, a Cornell senior who plays football for Quaker Valley under a cooperative sponsorship, knows his future is on the other side of the ball.
That's where he covers the sky like a cloud. Jackson, who already has given a verbal commitment to Pitt, projects as a college cornerback.
“I've played defense basically my whole life,” Jackson said. “It will be kind of tough, but I know I can do it. I work on it all the time, so I'll be fine.”
At 6-foot, 168 pounds, Jackson has great size for a defensive back. His athleticism is evident by his basketball ability, where he averaged 28.5 points.
“It helps me a lot,” Jackson said. “I'm tall for a corner. It will be tough for quarterbacks to throw over me. And I'm pretty physical, so I can jam my man in coverage.”
With Chris Conlan playing opposite Jackson, Quaker Valley could have one of the top cornerback duos in WPIAL Class AA. It's why Jackson has big goals.
“I just want to lead my team to the best season ever,” Jackson said. “That's it.”
Whether he does it at quarterback or cornerback, Jackson promises to be a dual threat.
Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.