ShareThis Page

Sewickley Academy girls golfers finish 2nd at WPIALs for 2nd straight year

| Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, 9:01 p.m.
Sewickley Academy sophomore Jane Blaugrund plays in the WPIAL Class AA golf championships Thursday, Oct. 10, 2013, at Cedarbrook Golf Course in Rostraver Township.
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Sewickley Academy sophomore Jane Blaugrund plays in the WPIAL Class AA golf championships Thursday, Oct. 10, 2013, at Cedarbrook Golf Course in Rostraver Township.

For the Sewickley Academy girls golf team, a second-place finish at the WPIAL Class AA girls golf championship was a mission accomplished.

“It was the goal we set at the beginning of the year,” Panthers coach Nancy Means said. “We knew the No. 1 team usually shoots around par and we probably wouldn't do that. We are a young program and to finish second two years in a row is a really good thing.”

The Panthers shot a 392. Central Valley won the championship with a score of 310. Derry was third with a 416 and Mt. Pleasant was fourth with a 421.

Junior Tanvi Rana — who finished 14th at the WPIAL Class AA individual championship — led Sewickley Academy with an 85. Junior Rachel Becker finished with a 99, sophomore Jane Blaugrund finished with a 107, freshman Natalie Wei shot a 106 and sophomore Kelsey Milo finished with a 110.

The team's No. 2 player, Brianne Thomas, missed the WPIAL championship due to a concussion.

The Panthers were no strangers to Cedarbrook Golf Course. In addition to several golfers playing on last season's runner-up team, Sewickley Academy kicked off its season Aug. 19 at the Chairman's Cup, which is held at the Rostraver Township course.

“We played the white tees (last week), and at the Chairman's Cup we used the red tees, so it was a bit longer,” Means said. “It is a tough course. A lot of bunkers and some water make your second shot difficult.”

While the course did prove to be challenging, the players said the toughest thing to overcome may have been playing alone with a group of golfers from other teams.

“The most difficult thing was not having your teammates,” Becker said. “If you have a bad hole, the other team's girls are nice but it isn't like someone from your team who can help us by telling us what is wrong.”

The strong finish was a fitting end to the season. The team went 8-3 in match play with two of the losses to WPIAL champion Central Valley.

From the time the team gathered at Stonewall Resort and took lessons from a professional until their silver-medal performance, Means was pleased with their development.

“I can just tell by looking at our scores,” Means said. “Everyone improved greatly. Having one more year with the girls going to golf school should only makes us better.”

The growth just hasn't been with how the girls play but also their mentality when they get on the course.”

“The expectations have changed a lot,” Rana said. “I remember freshmen year I would be happy with a 60. I think I would cry if I shot that now.”

While the team achieved its second-place finish it had hoped for this season, next year the Panthers are raising their expectations and hoping to challenge for a WPIAL title.

“We have so much room to improve,” Blaugrund said. “We are all dedicated and we know the expectations will be higher. We are all going to work hard so we are better next season.”

Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @NSmith_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.