Norwin girls golf team finishes season strong
TribLIVE Sports Videos
After a slow start to section play this season, Norwin girls golf coach Mike Buscemi hoped his team would show some improvement in the second half.
He got just what he was looking for.
The Knights, who began the season 1-5 in section play, closed the season by winning four of their final six section matches to post an overall 5-7 record for the year.
“I was very proud of them,” Buscemi said. “Not only (did the team go 4-2), we ended up shooting back-to-back season lows, going 188 against Gateway and 185 against Franklin (Regional).”
Inconsistency plagued the Knights during the first half of the season. Several of the team's players showed the capability to shoot low rounds, but the team couldn't get more than one player to shoot a low round on any given day.
That problem corrected itself during the second half of the season, as the Knights were able to get strong performances from multiple golfers on the same day.
“Something clicked,” Buscemi said. “We did have a few home matches in a row, (and) we have a good home-field advantage. But they still had to come out and shoot low scores. The second half of the season, I was very impressed with the scores we were coming in with.”
The five victories this season marked a three-win improvement from 2012.
Norwin will lose senior starters Rachael DelBene and Lindsey Robinson from this year's squad. Junior Kaitlyn Spehar, sophomore Ember Toth and freshman Morgan Johnson will return from the starting lineup, and Buscemi said he had several other young players who could compete for a spot next season.
“The seniors will be missed,” Buscemi said. “They were a big contributor in the success that we had this year. Although they will be missed, I know that I do have younger girls ready to fill that void for next year and be ready to go play comptitive golf.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.