ShareThis Page

Fox Chapel lineman Cohen commits to Bryant

Doug Gulasy
| Tuesday, Oct. 31, 2017, 9:51 p.m.
Fox Chapel's Jesse Cohen
Fox Chapel's Jesse Cohen

Jesse Cohen didn't recognize Bryant's scholarship offer when it originally came in the summer. But when the school's coaches reaffirmed it last week, he readily accepted.

Cohen, a Fox Chapel senior lineman, verbally committed to Bryant on Tuesday, picking the Football Championship Subdivision school over scholarship offers from Dayton, Edinboro, Lawrence Tech, Saginaw Valley State, Seton Hill, Stetson and West Virginia State, as well as a preferred walk-on offer from Kent State.

“The way the coaches came off, they were really passionate about me, made me feel wanted,” Cohen said. “And definitely the academics played a huge part in it, too.”

Cohen visited Bryant in the spring and attended a football camp there in the summer, after which the coaches made their initial offer. He didn't understand it for what it was at the time, but the coaches “cleared that up last week,” he said.

A 6-foot-3, 250-pound left tackle, Cohen anchors a Fox Chapel line that blocked for a pair of 1,000-yard rushers in quarterback Nick Gizzo and running back Micah Morris. The Foxes (6-4) play Penn-Trafford in the WPIAL Class 5A first round Friday, which was a factor in Cohen's Tuesday decision.

“I just wanted to clear my mind from everything and chose the school that's been the best to me and fits me the best academically and athletically,” said Cohen, who plans to major in business. “(I can) just focus on playoffs now.”

Doug Gulasy is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @dgulasy_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.