Prospect watch: Thomas Jefferson's Chase Winovich
6-foot-4, 212 pounds, LB, Thomas Jefferson
Chase Winovich watched his older brother, Peter, move from quarterback to tight end to linebacker before finally settling in as a two-year starter at fullback for Bowling Green.
That's why the younger Winovich is happy to have found a permanent position. Thomas Jefferson coach Bill Cherpak moved him from safety to middle linebacker early in the season, then watched the junior blossom into a big-time recruit.
“He had a good year, and you can see that on film,” Cherpak said. “He's so physical. He'll run through you. He makes the play before it develops. It's really impressive. Once everyone sees him and how fast he plays, he's going to get a ton of offers.”
Winovich received his first scholarship offer when Pitt pulled the trigger on Wednesday. Penn State, West Virginia, Michigan State, Northwestern and Virginia also are showing interest.
“It was awesome to get my first scholarship opportunity, and it was really cool that it was from my hometown school,” Winovich said. “I want to be a linebacker in college, and that's what they want me for. It's very relieving to me because I know that I have the skill set and people have their faith in me. I can concentrate on one position and try to excel at that.”
Former TJ and Pitt star Dom DeCicco, now a middle linebacker with the Chicago Bears, took Winovich under his wing and showed him the nuances of playing the position. Winovich led the Jaguars in every defensive category except interceptions, recording 69 tackles, nine sacks, three forced fumbles and four fumble recoveries.
“It was cool seeing the transition from a shaky safety to what I evolved into at linebacker,” Winovich said. “My team rallied around me, and I definitely couldn't have accomplished what I did without them.”
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.