Prospect watch: Penns Manor's Danny Ferens
6-foot, 195 pounds, QB-WR, Penns Manor
After rushing for 1,818 yards and 31 touchdowns this past fall, Danny Ferens wanted to keep the ball in his hands in college even if he knew his days at quarterback were numbered.
When Penn promised he could play receiver, Ferens couldn't turn down the combination of Ivy League academics and playing offense for a Division I-FCS team.
“It's going to be a little bit different at first, but I feel I can adapt,” Ferens said. “What the coaches tell me is that I'm best in the open field. They want to throw it to me in the open.”
Ferens is the son of Dan Ferens, a business administrator in the Steelers' front office. Despite playing in relative obscurity at Penns Manor, a District 6-A school in Indiana County, he still had offers from Air Force, Colgate, Duquesne, Lehigh and Indiana (Pa.). Pitt and Penn State wanted him as a preferred walk-on.
“I think he's an electric athlete,” said Bob Lichtenfels, recruiting analyst for 247 Sports. “Every time he touches the ball, he's literally a threat to score. The thing that hurt him over the years is competition. He hasn't played anybody, so he hasn't been seen that much. But he literally dominated everybody he played.”
Lichtenfels believes that Ferens, who has been timed at 4.52 seconds in the 40-yard dash, would have had BCS offers if he had played in the WPIAL. Ferens, who has a 96-percent grade average and scored 1,660 on the SAT, had his eye on the Ivy League anyway.
“I thought about moving, but I was too loyal to my team and my close-knit friendships,” Ferens said. “Even if I'd had the D-I offers, I probably still would have went the Ivy League route just because of the education.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.