Prospect watch: Lincoln Park junior G/F Ryan Skovranko
6-foot-7, Jr., G-F, Lincoln Park
Kentucky's John Calipari had to cancel a scheduled visit with Lincoln Park junior Ryan Skovranko, but the coach promised he'll return.
Skovranko, a 6-foot-7 junior guard/forward, doesn't have a Kentucky scholarship offer, nor was one expected, but a visit from one of the nation's top recruiters certainly should boost Skovranko's status among college coaches.
Calipari, a Moon native, had planned to visit Wednesday but canceled after Kentucky star freshman Nerlens Noel suffered a season-ending knee injury.
“He couldn't make it, but he said he was coming back,” said Lincoln Park's Mike Bariski, who's athletic director and assistant basketball coach at the performing arts charter school in Midland, Beaver County.
Calipari and assistant Orlando Antigua sat courtside at Palumbo Center last March when Lincoln Park won the WPIAL Class A championship over a Cornell team led by Calipari's high school coach, Bill Sacco. They noticed Skovranko, and Antigua watched him again on the AAU circuit.
“Orlando is the one who's seen Ryan a bunch of times,” Bariski said. “He's high on Skovranko and really wants Calipari to come and see him.”
Skovranko has offers from Duquesne and Elon, and Virginia Tech could soon follow. Miami also has shown interest, Bariski said. But having a recruiter of numerous one-and-done McDonald's All-Americans visit the gym would be a highlight, whether it comes with a Kentucky offer or not.
“If he does make an offer, Ryan wouldn't get ‘yes' out of his mouth fast enough,” Bariski said.
— Chris Harlan
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.