Prospect watch: Montour point guard Devin Wilson
6-foot-4, 180 pounds, PG, Montour
Since Devin Wilson decided to pick basketball over football as his college sport, the Montour two-sport star has doubled his reasons to believe it was the right call.
Wilson has twice as many scholarship offers for basketball than he did for football. George Mason, Hofstra, Rider, Robert Morris, St. Bonaventure, St. Joseph's and Western Michigan want the wiry 6-foot-4 point guard with the cool demeanor.
“Ever since I said that, probably at least five to 10 teams have gotten into the mix,” Wilson said. “It just kind of came into perspective that this is what I want to do and what I can be successful at.”
On Friday night, Wilson tripled the reasons for coaches to recruit him. Actually, make that triple-double.
With Villanova's Jay Wright, St. Joe's Phil Martelli, UNC-Wilmington's Buzz Peterson and George Mason assistant Ronald Houston in attendance, Wilson turned in a 24-point, 10-rebound, 10-assist effort in a PIAA playoff victory over South Fayette.
Wilson was aware the coaches would be there, so he wanted to put on an impressive performance. He delivered one that should put him on the high-major radar.
“All the coaches who were there called me or texted me the day before and said they were coming, so I knew they were going to be there and tried to do the best I could,” said Wilson, who has plans to visit George Mason and St. Joe's. “It's definitely a good feeling. I need to keep my mental focus to see if I can play at a high-major and play at that level. I feel like I can, but that doesn't always mean it's true. I have to see how my game can translate to their level.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.