Prospect watch: Mt. Lebanon's Alex Bookser
6-foot-6, 295 pounds, OL-DL, Mt. Lebanon
Alex Bookser paid attention to the media following his Twitter account, so he decided to play an April Fool's joke on reporters. The Mt. Lebanon junior lineman announced he was committing to Pitt, then watched as word spread like wildfire. Bookser's timing could be considered cruel, given that reporters were working on stories about tailback Rushel Shell's decision to transfer from Pitt.
“It was a joke, not to the Pitt fan base but more toward the media,” Bookser said. “When I sent the tweet, it wasn't with the intention to add to (the Shell saga). I wasn't trying to add insult to injury.”
Bookser's recruitment, however, is no joke.
He has developed into a national recruit, with scholarship offers ranging from Pitt, Rutgers and West Virginia to Alabama, Florida State, Georgia and Tennessee. Mt. Lebanon coach Mike Melnyk wasted no time warning Bookser to beware of his newfound fame.
“I tried to use that as a learning tool,” Melnyk said. “You're not just a high school kid goofing off anymore. People are watching you. I think he was just trying to be cute on April Fool's Day. I think that was a good learning lesson for him, as far as social media and understanding that he's in a fishbowl now.”
An honor roll student who started both ways for the Blue Devils, Bookser is being recruited to play offensive tackle and defensive end. He combines a high-speed motor with stamina on defense but believes he will end up on offense because of his size.
“He plays really low for a big guy, plays well with his hands and runs sideline to sideline,” Melnyk said. “Coaches were impressed that in the fourth quarter he was still running guys down.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.