ShareThis Page

Bishop Canevin hoops duo commits to Point Park

| Wednesday, May 8, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Bishop Canevin's Celina DiPietro, right, and Seton-La Salle's Cassidy Walsh battle for a rebound during the WPIAL Class AA title game. Randy Jarosz | for the Signal Item
Bishop Canevin's Carly Forse (20) grabs a rebound from Burrell's Erika Finn (32) and Bishop Canevin's Alaina McGuire (10) during the PIAA Class AA playoff game at North Hills High School on Friday March 15, 2013.

Bishop Canevin senior basketball players Carly Forse and Celina DiPietro signed their letters of intent last week to continue their playing careers at Point Park.

It was a fitting end to a whirlwind season.

“It couldn't have been more perfect,” DiPietro said.

The duo was a major part of Bishop Canevin's 27-4 season that saw the Crusaders defeat Seton-La Salle, 56-47, for the WPIAL Class AA title and York Catholic, 45-38, for the PIAA title.

Forse averaged 14 points and 12 rebounds, and DiPietro added 12 ppg.

All three seniors will continue their playing careers at the next level. Erin Waskowiak — Bishop Canevin's other senior — is going to Duquesne.

Point Park seemed to be a perfect fit for both players. DiPietro and Forse praised the academics and campus as major drawing factors.

“I wanted to be close to home, and it was a good school to go to,” Forse said.

DiPietro said she will study civil engineering, and Forse is undecided of her major.

While the Point Park coaching staff followed Forse closely throughout the season, its interest in DiPietro came later. Thanks to some big performances in the postseason, DiPietro was seen as a solution to a glaring weakness.

“I got to see Bishop Canevin play about five or six times,” Point Park coach Tony Grenek said. “The first time was when they played Oakland Catholic early in the year. As the season went on, you could see how the overall team improved. Then you see (DiPietro) hitting those 3-pointers in that state playoff games.

“That has been our one weakness the last two years. We have played some great ‘D,' and we're good in the post but we lacked outside shooting. (DiPietro) brings that to the table.”

Grenek just completed his second season with Point Park and has a 48-14 record. He led the Pioneers to their first appearance in the NAIA Division II National Tournament in 2011-12.

He led the team to the tournament again this season as Point Park finished with a 25-7 record.

“I like Coach Grenek,” DiPietro said. “He really seems to know what he's doing.”

The pair agreed that going to Point Park together will help the transition into playing at the college level. They have played together for four yearsat Bishop Canevin and have a good understanding of how each other play.

“Going into that environment with someone I am used to will help me feel more comfortable on the court,” Forse said. “We are really excited to play with each other in college.”

Grenek said the Pioneers will use whatever system best fits the players. In his first season with the squad, the team had good size, allowing it to press and fall back into a zone. In Year 2, the team was smaller and suffered some injuries, so it used a half-court, man-to-man scheme.

No matter what the coaching staff decides to run, Grenek said the two Bishop Canevin commits will fit in.

“These two girls have high basketball IQs and come from a great high school program,” Grenek said. “Whatever system we decide to implement, they will be able to adapt.”

Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 412-388-5813.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.