Quaker Valley runner to continue career at Southern New Hampshire
Quaker Valley's Josh Szymanski said getting a good education was top priority when choosing a college.
Being able to run cross country was just an added bonus.
The senior recently signed his letter of intent to run cross country at Southern New Hampshire University, where he plans to study game design.
“(Running) has been a big part of my high school career,” Szymanski said. “It has been a big part of my life, and I am excited to continue it.”
He also considered attending Rochester Institute of Technology, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Ohio, Shawnee State, and Miami (Ohio).
In addition to an athletic scholarship, Szymanski was awarded the university's Presidential Scholarship, which is given to students with a minimum GPA of 3.5 and a pre-determined SAT/ACT score.
Southern New Hampshire competes in the Northeast 10 Conference. The NCAA Division II conference has 16 members spread throughout Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Vermont. The Penmen are coached by Joanne Drew, who competed in the 2008 Summer Olympics in racewalking.
Szymanski was a four-year member of the Quaker Valley cross country team, as well as the track and field team. He won three WPIAL cross country team championships and a PIAA title in 2011. He is a three-time individual qualifier for the PIAA meet and a two-time WPIAL medalist.
Szymanski finished 13th at the 2012 WPIAL Class AA championship with a time of 17:35 and was 67th at the PIAA meet with a time of 18:09.
“I have certainly improved both my endurance and speed,” Szymanski said.
— Nathan Smith
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.