Lincoln Park basketball standout Rowan picks Pitt
Lincoln Park's Maverick Rowan drives past OLSH's Ian Schrenk during their game Friday, Feb. 1, 2013, in Moon.
Photo by Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pitt coach Jamie Dixon has found the sharpshooting guard for whom he's been searching, but he's still a few years away from playing for the Panthers.
Maverick Rowan, a 6-foot-7 sharpshooter who averaged 23.5 points as a freshman at Lincoln Park this past season, gave a verbal commitment to play basketball at Pitt. Verbal commitments are non-binding, and Rowan can't sign with the Panthers until November 2015.
“It's really close to home, where my family and friends can come see me play in the best conference in America,” Rowan said. “Pitt has a great coach, staff and facilities. The list goes on.”
Ohio State, North Carolina and UCLA also were showing strong interest in Rowan, whose father, Ron, starred at Beaver Falls and played at Notre Dame and St. John's and then professionally overseas.
“Jamie Dixon offered him Friday, and he verbally committed,” said Lincoln Park athletic director Mike Bariski, an assistant coach for the Leopards. “Jamie has been down to see him a whole bunch of times. They really like him. It's a good thing that keeps Maverick around.
“He's not done growing yet. He's going to be a 6-9 shooting guard. He can light it up, and he's almost always automatic on free throws. He's probably the hardest worker you'll ever meet, just like his dad. His willingness to get better is like no other kid I've ever met. He has that attitude that he wants to be the best, and he's going to be the best. He uses his body and his basketball intelligence to create spacing. His basketball IQ is out of this world.”
Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.