Share This Page

Aliquippa's Fields commits to WVU

| Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013, 11:57 a.m.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Aliquippa's Jaleel Fields works out during a practice in Aliquippa.

Before announcing his college choice, Jaleel Fields spoke with his parents and prayed about his decision.

Then the Aliquippa defensive tackle decided to make a verbal commitment to West Virginia, the second Quips player in three days to choose the Mountaineers.

“I felt comfortable there,” Fields said. “My mom and dad (John and Tinita) told me to choose the school that fits me. That's what I did.”

The 6-foot-2, 290-pound Fields, a four-year starter who was a three-time All-Midwestern Conference selection and a member of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Terrific 25 as a junior, chose WVU over finalists Cincinnati and Purdue. Connecticut and Temple also offered.

Fields anchored a line that led the Quips to four consecutive appearances in the WPIAL Class AA final, including championships in 2011 and '12. He opened holes for the most prolific backfield tandem in WPIAL history in 5,000-yard rusher Dravon Henry and 4,000-yard rusher Terry Swanson. Henry on Monday committed to West Virginia, a day after Swanson committed to Toledo.

“We did discuss it, but it didn't really play a big part,” Fields said of Henry's choice. “It's not too far away from home. I liked the atmosphere on game day, the academic program and the coaches.”

WVU has 18 commitments in its 2014 recruiting class — three from the WPIAL in Fields, Henry and Gateway receiver Ricky Rogers.

Fields announced his decision Wednesday morning on Twitter, then spoke to West Virginia coaches.

“They were excited,” Fields said. “They said, ‘Welcome to the family.' ”

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at kgorman@tribweb.com or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.