Trib Prospect: Pine-Richland's Ben DiNucci
Pine-Richland quarterback Ben DiNucci rolls out to pass during the first quarter of a Quad North game against Seneca Valley on Thursday, Sept. 5, 2013, in Pine.
Photo by Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Before Pine-Richland's Ben DiNucci could attract multiple scholarship offers, the 2015 graduate needed his first.
“It's almost like a validation thing,” Pine-Richland coach Eric Kasperowicz said. “Every recruiter that I talk to, generally speaking, the No. 1 question that they ask is: What other offers do they have?”
Now DiNucci can list Akron and James Madison. When Kasperowicz hosted recruiters at a workout day earlier this month for DiNucci and several other Rams, Akron offered immediately. James Madison followed last week.
“(Akron's coach) was actually surprised that Pitt, Penn State, all the big programs weren't after him,” Kasperowicz said.
DiNucci completed 72 percent of his passes last season (169 of 235). He had 2,147 passing yards with 15 touchdowns.
“Above all else, (college coaches) like his accuracy and his arm strength,” Kasperowicz said. “The other thing everybody consistently says about him is his ability to extend the play. ... Straight-line speed, he's really fast. Probably one of our fastest guys on the team.”
— Chris Harlan
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.