ShareThis Page

Recruiting: Wade earns elusive 5th star from

| Saturday, Feb. 6, 2016, 9:39 p.m.
Sidney Davis | Trib Total Media
Clairton's Lamont Wade reacts after scoring a touchdown against Jeannette in the WPIAL Class A championship game Saturday, Nov. 28, 2015. Wade had three receptions for 100 yards and three touchdowns. He also rushed for 101 yards on 19 carries.

The stars have aligned for Clairton's Lamont Wade. added another star to the junior's profile this week, making him a five-star recruit for both Scout and Scout has labeled 19 recruits in the nation as five-stars from Wade's 2017 class, and Rivals has 18. But only eight recruits cross over and are five-stars for both.

Around the WPIAL, Wade becomes just the fourth recruit in the past decade to earn dual five-star status from those two recruiting websites. The others were Gateway linebacker Dorian Bell in 2009, and Jeannette quarterback Terrelle Pryor and Aliquippa receiver Jon Baldwin, both in 2008.

Only two others in the state were five stars for both during that time frame: Philadelphia George Washington's Sharrif Floyd in 2010 and Harrisburg Bishop McDevitt's Noah Spence in 2012. Both were defensive linemen. Floyd plays for the Minnesota Vikings, and Spence should be drafted this year.

So Wade's in elite company.

“When you're a five-star kid, at least in my eyes, what you're saying is: ‘I expect this kid to be in the NFL,' ” said Brian Dohn, a Scout national recruiting analyst for the east region. “Everybody has their own definition.”

To Dohn, a five-star recruit should be able to play as a college freshman and potentially start. Dohn, who lives in New Jersey, covers Virginia through New England. He named Woodland Hills running back Miles Sanders a five-star recruit in the 2016 class, but Rivals has the Penn State commit with four. Dohn was convinced Wade deserved five stars at the WPIAL finals in November.

“You know how in baseball you have your five-tool player?” Dohn said. “Well, when you're looking at (football recruits) from a star perspective, you take a kid like Lamont and say, what does he do well? First of all, he covers. And it's not just that he can cover, it's that it's easy for him to get in and out of breaks and change direction. He can be really low on his backpedal, then go forward and drive on the ball. That's the most fundamental thing you need as a corner. So how good are you with that? Lamont's sensational at it. He does it better than almost anybody in the country.

“And then you say, what else does he do? Can he get off a block, be physical and play the run? Does he have field awareness? Does he chase the play to the other side? Does he do all this stuff at a high rate of speed? And does he have the work ethic?”

Dohn answered yes to each.

“Of all the kids I saw during the season — and I bet I saw 75 games — he was one of my favorites,” he said. “He's just the whole package.”

Chris Harlan is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.