ShareThis Page

Latrobe hoping to pull off another upset in Penguins Cup championship game

| Monday, March 20, 2017, 5:57 p.m.
Kristina Serafini | Tribune-Review
Latrobe's Ryan Pal makes a save on Quaker Valley's Noah Shultz during the PIHL Penguins Cup Class AA semifinals Tuesday, March 14, 2017, at Robert Morris University Island Sports Center.

Since 2008, Latrobe has won four PIHL Penguins Cup Class AA titles.

The Wildcats would like to add a fifth when they take on Plum at 8:30 p.m. Tuesday for the championship at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex in Cranberry.

Latrobe claimed titles from 2008-10 and another in 2013, but this group of players has not lifted the trophy.

“It's a great opportunity for these kids. Last year, we graduated the last kids to play in the last Penguins Cup for Latrobe,” Latrobe coach Josh Werner said. “These kids have never been to a Penguins Cup. It's been a great journey and we have one more to go.”

Getting past the top-seeded Mustangs (18-2-1) will be a challenge for the Wildcats (12-9-1). Both teams play in the Western Conference, and Plum won both meetings by a pair of goals.

“No one thought we'd be here right now. We're kind of using that to our advantage,” Werner said. “No one (around the league) believes in these kids except for the coaches and those in the locker room. We knew we could make a run at this thing.”

Plum led the division with 117 goals. However, the Wildcats finished third with 98. That concerns the Mustangs.

“Latrobe is a very good team and, with their bracket over there, they're dangerous,” Plum coach Vinnie Somma said. “I think we just have to play smart because they can score. There's no doubt about that.”

Added Plum center Anthony Borriello, who had a hat trick in the team's 5-2 semifinal win over Hempfield: “They have a lot of highly skilled players, and we're going to have to come ready to play and give it our all.”

Latrobe hopes to be the second lower seed in as many years to win a Class AA championship.

Last season, Bishop Canevin entered the Penguins Cup playoffs as a No. 3 seed and it claimed the title.

The fourth-seeded Wildcats beat Mars, 5-4, in a play-in game and upset Moon, the West's top seed, 6-3, in the quarterfinals.

They upset third-seeded Quaker Valley, 6-3, in the semifinals.

Latrobe's consecutive 6-3 wins are a departure from the team's usual close finishes. In the regular season, 11 of the team's 19 games were decided by two goals or less.

The Wildcats posted a 3-7-1 record in those contests. They claimed their only close playoff game.

“We've worked so hard this year, and we've been in so many close games that we knew the effort it'd take to get here,” Werner said. “We want to be sure that, when we earn opportunities, we cash in on them. I think that's what got us here — we've done that in big games.”

Another key for Latrobe is that it has scored first in its playoff games — all of them coming from Rossi. He's not the only one finding the back of the net, though. Jared Schimizzi, Gerg Ferri and Cory Gates all have three goals and Jack Schultheis, Jacob Burkardt, Cole Novak, Brantley Miller and Jarred Stein have scored, as well.

“We're all clicking right now,” said Rossi, who was one of six different Latrobe players to score against the Quakers. “We're getting goals from guys who don't usually score, too, which is nice. We just want to keep it rolling.”

Meanwhile, Plum has fallen behind in both of its playoff games.

The Mustangs were down 1-0 to Shaler, in the quarterfinals.

The score was tied 2-2 after the first, but Plum scored the next three for a 5-2 win. The Mustangs fell behind Hempfield, 1-0, and trailed 2-1 after the first but notched the next four goals.

“I think we get better every game,” Borriello said. “We always take things in that we learn and adjust our game so we can get to that championship.”

Joe Sager is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.