ShareThis Page

Alle-Kiski Valley high school roundup: Plum hockey falls to Bethel Park

| Monday, Nov. 20, 2017, 11:45 p.m.

The Plum hockey team led by one goal at the end of the second period of Monday's PIHL Class AAA game at Pittsburgh Ice Arena.

But visiting Bethel Park rallied with two scores over the final 17 minutes to earn a 3-2 victory.

The Mustangs fell to 1-6 in league play, and the Black Hawks improved to 2-5.

J.C. Bele tallied the tying and winning goals for Bethel. Dom Borriello scored twice for Plum, and one of his goals came as the Mustangs were short-handed.

Sergio Benitez made 33 saves for Plum.

Meadville 11, Kiski Area 5 — Nick Frantz scored six goals and added two assists as Meadville cruised to a Varsity A win over Kiski Area. Luke English scored four goals and recorded one assist for Meadville (7-0). Austin Lapiana recorded a hat-trick and dished out one assist for Kiski Area (3-4).

Thomas Jefferson 5, Fox Chapel 2 — The Jaguars (7-0) scored three third-period goals to break a tie and record the Varsity A victory over the Foxes (2-4-1). Matt Krieger scored twice and added an assist to lead Thomas Jefferson, and Chase Villani scored on the power play and recorded an assist for Fox Chapel. Tyler Radigan made 40 saves in net for the Foxes.

Postponement — A power failure Monday at Frozen Pond Arena in Valencia postponed the Varsity A game between Deer Lakes and Greensburg Salem. A rescheduled date for the game has yet to be announced. The Lancers (4-2) return to action next Monday at 7:10 p.m. with a home game against Westmont Hilltop (5-0).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.