Golden Eagles suffer first loss
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Keystone Oaks hockey coach John McCarthy had a simple explanation of what happened during the Golden Eagles 11-3 loss to Ford City last week – the Sabers simply outplayed them.
“Ford City kept its game simple,” McCarthy said. “They outworked us and our kids didn't respond well. We had players trying to do too much and it came back and hurt us.”
Ford City got on the scoreboard first but Bryton Tomko evened the score at 1-1 on an unassisted goal.
Ford City then jumped out to a 3-1 lead but Ryan Rosato cut the deficit to one off an assist from Tomko late in the first period.
The second period was all Ford City as it outscored Keystone Oaks, 3-0.
The Sabers kept it up coming out of intermission, scoring three early goals. Tomko scored an unassisted goal to stop the Ford City streak, but the visitors finished with two more goals.
“We started chasing the puck and not playing our positions,” McCarthy said. “Once you start chasing the puck, you are in for a long night.”
The loss dropped Keystone Oaks to 2-1. The Golden Eagles are in a three-way tie for first place in Section 4 of the Open Class with Baldwin and Greensburg Salem.
Senior captain Ryan Ribeau was hit with a game misconduct penalty in the final five minutes of play – a penalty that will result in a suspension during the team's next game.
“We had some players who let their emotions get the best of them,” McCarthy said. “They have to learn to keep that in check.
“It will bring some adversity to our next game but if they can respond well, it will be a good stepping stone.”
The Golden Eagles return to the ice Nov. 29 as they travel to Greensburg Salem. The puck drops at 9:15 p.m.
Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 412-388-5813.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.