Construction delays outdoor rink's opening
The NHL isn't the only highly anticipated hockey that's been delayed this early winter. But when it comes to the Penguins Pond, don't blame the lockout.
The community outdoor rink that initially was constructed outside of Heinz Field as part of the festivities surrounding the Jan. 1, 2011, Winter Classic has rapidly become a Pittsburgh tradition. The third season for it, however, will be an abbreviated one. The Penguins moved their Pond to the new Highmark Stadium in Station Square.
But with that facility — the future home of the Riverhounds — still being constructed, the outdoor rink couldn't open as planned.
“The only challenge this year was we had to wait until they were far enough along on construction of the new stadium before we could schedule an ice rink,” Penguins vice president of communications Tom McMillan said. “The plan was to have it opened by Thanksgiving. Once that wasn't possible, the decision was, do we skip it this year? Or do it in a shortened time frame? We decided it was important enough to a lot of people to go through with it.”
The rink is scheduled to be open Dec. 14-Jan. 13. It will be used for public skating sessions and PIHL, PAHL (youth/amateur) and Penguins Elite (junior) games.
The Pond was at the South Side Works last winter. The new site was chosen to be visible from vantage points downtown, as well as provide a skyline backdrop.
“It's an ideal facility. You have the scoreboard and the locker rooms and parking already there,” said PIHL commissioner Ed Sam, who said 25-28 of the scheduled 40 games could be played. “It's a great idea. We just ran into some construction problems. Next year should be no sweat.”
Chris Adamski is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.