Gateway snaps losing skid, 5-1
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Kiski Area scored the first goal in last week's PIHL Class AA game with Gateway at Center Ice Arena in Delmont.
That was all the Cavaliers would muster.
Gateway exploded for four goals in the second period and added one more in the third to score a 5-1 win and snap a five game losing streak.
The Gators, now 2-7, hadn't tasted victory since a 4-2 triumph over Plum on Nov. 8.
Kiski Area fell to 2-8.
The Cavaliers came into the game with a pair of wins over Franklin Regional.
Senior Jonathan Kasper got Gateway on the board 6:33 into the second period with a goal off an assist from fellow senior Taylor Siwik.
Siwik then got in the scoring act only 19 seconds later. Freshmen Ryan Taylor and Brandon Dusch provided assists.
Gateway went down a man at the 9:49 mark, as senior Cam Cacolice was whistled for roughing.
Undaunted, the Gators converted a short-handed opportunity into a goal at the 11:33 mark, as Kasper tallied his second of the game and third overall since returning to the team three games ago.
Freshman William McAllister capped the second-period scoring for Gateway with his second goal in as many games at the 12:05 mark. Kasper assisted on the goal, his third assist on the season.
Siwik, with an assist from Cacolice, scored with 4:45 left to set the final. He now leads the Gators with nine goals in eight games this season.
Junior goaltender Tyler Perhac stopped 29 of 30 Kiski shots to post the victory, while Gateway also fired off 32 shots.
Gateway and Kiski Area will play again when both teams resume the season in the new year. The Gators will play the hosts on Jan. 3 at 7:45 p.m. at Center Ice.
Michael Love is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5825 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.