ShareThis Page

In-line hockey squad struggles through rough stretch

| Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013, 9:46 p.m.

The holidays are always a festive time for celebrating the season with family and friends. For the Southmoreland Varsity hockey team, the holiday stretch was a bit on the downside.

The Scotties finished the month of December with a 1-3 record and have gone from near the top of the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Roller Hockey League Varsity 2 division standings, all the way down to the middle of the pack with a 5-6-0-3 record. Southmoreland now sits in 10th place overall in the 20-team division, one point behind Mars and three points out of eighth place, behind West Allegheny.

Hampton leads the division with a 13-2 record, and has won 12 games in a row heading into this weekend's action.

Southmoreland has lost its last four games, compiling a 0-2-0-2 record in the last four contests. Two of those losses came in overtime, which makes losing the game a little easier to swallow, but for coach C.J. King and his squad, it is a bitter pill that doesn't sit well with the defending Varsity 2 champions.

“We have been in the games, but we have come up short recently,” said King. “We will have to put forth a better effort and work harder in practice if we expect to climb back up the division standings and make a run in the playoffs again.”

The Scotties started the month of December well with a 5-1 win over Seneca Valley. But since then, it has been a tough road to travel for Southmoreland.

Despite two goals apiece from Jeremy Suitor and David Miller, Southmoreland lost a heartbreaking 5-4 overtime thriller to Hempfield on Dec. 9, and the Scotties have failed to recover from that game, dropping three straight games since then.

On Dec. 15, the Scotties gave the Deer Lakes Lancers all that they could handle, before falling 4-3.

The latest loss came at the hands of West Allegheny Jan. 6 as the Scotties came back from the holiday break with a bit of a hangover. The team did not look sharp and no one from Southmoreland could find a solution for J.D. Gazella, who scored six goals for West Allegheny on its way to a 8-2 rout of the Scotties. Gazella now has 31 goals and seven assists, good for 38 points on the season.

Southmoreland out shot West Allegheny 42-28, but couldn't solve goaltender Matt Bryan. Bryan turned away 40 of the 42 shots he faced, and West Allegheny put a little distance between itself and the Scotties with a convincing win.

For Southmoreland, Jordan Sandzimier scored the first Scottie goal midway through the second period, and Jacob Miller recorded his first-ever P.I.R.H.L. goal late in the contest.

Tanner Skovira stopped 20 shots in the game. Skovira ranks ninth in goals against in the Varsity 2 division. He has allowed 58 goals in 14 games between the pipes, and has allowed only 4.09 goals per game to Southmoreland opponents.

Jeremy Suitor is the leading scorer for the Scotties. Suitor currently ranks 11th in the scoring race in the Varsity 2 division with 22 points.

Southmoreland is hoping that the return of junior Brady King to its lineup will spark another late season run and propel the team back into contention.

“Making the playoffs is huge,” said King. “Once you get in, anything can happen.”

In order for the Scotties to make anything happen, they will have to play well on the road. The team plays four of its next five games in Harmarville and at the Robert Morris University sports complex.

Mark King is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.