Share This Page

Frazier's penalty kill spearheads win over Connellsville

| Monday, Jan. 21, 2013, 11:48 p.m.
Frazier's Nicholas Farrell (red) moves the puck up ice through Connellsville's defense in the first period of Frazier's match up against Connellsville held at The Ice Mine on Monday, January 21, 2013. Evan R. Sanders | Daily Courier

It has not been an easy season for the Connellsville and Frazier hockey teams. Coming into Monday's PIHL Open Division game at the Ice Mine, the Falcons still were searching for their first victory of the season, while the Commodores, playing in their inaugural season, were looking to snap an eight-game losing skid.

The game was close throughout, but the Commodores used a tremendous penalty-killing effort in the third period to earn a 7-3 victory. Frazier killed off six Connellsville power plays in the third period, including a stretch in which the Commodores had four players in the box, resulting in back-to-back two-man advantages for the Falcons.

“The PK was unreal,” Frazier coach Matt Olbrys said. “It's a group of guys that have worked hard all year, and they came up big for us.”

Frazier killed eight of nine penalties in the game and scored a pair of shorthanded goals.

Edward Kibe, Brian Gregg and Jacob Boucher each scored a pair of goals for the Commodores (3-13). Kibe finished with a four-point night, and Gregg had three points. Cullen McGinnis had two assists. Dean Corsaro scored a goal, and Ryan Sisley recorded an assist.

Gregg got the scoring started midway through the first when he beat Connellsville goalie Thomas Clark after a Connellsville turnover. However, the Falcons (0-12) tied it when Owen Hardy got control of a loose puck and beat Noah Santo up high. Kody Bigley picked up an assist on the tying goal.

Kibe and Gregg each scored to give Frazier a 3-1 lead, with Gregg's goal coming on a penalty kill. Connellsville responded to make it a 3-2 game when Jonathan Herchko scored on the power play late in the period. Herchko had a two-point game.

In the second, the teams traded goals. Connellsville tied the score on a goal by Jacob Miller, but Kibe netted a goal on a rebound to give the Commodores a 4-3 lead heading to the third.

Trailing by one in the final period, the Falcons were given chance after chance to tie the game, but Frazier's penalty killing was dominant. Despite having six power plays in the third, Connellsville managed just five shots against Santo.

“The guys have to make better passes,” Connellsville coach Mike Pleva said. “We didn't pass well, and Noah is a good goalie. It seemed like nobody wanted to go to the dirty areas.

“It was our game to win, but we didn't take it to them. We didn't score on the five-on-threes, and that's the game right there.”

Boucher helped seal the win with Frazier's second shorthanded tally of the game to make it 5-3. In the closing minutes, Boucher tallied his second of the game before Corsaro completed the scoring with the game's final goal.

For the Falcons, it was another loss, but Pleva did note some overall improvement in team play and pointed out that Connellsville's best player was Clark. The Connellsville goalie stopped 33 of 40 shots he faced.

Santo made 19 saves on 22 shots to earn the win for Frazier.

“Our goalie played tough,” Olbrys said. “He really battled. It's huge to break the (losing) streak because you want the team to believe in what you are teaching and it's tough when you don't get the results.”

Jason Black is the Local Sports Editor of the Daily Courier. He can be reached at jblack@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.