Top-seeded Bishop Canevin hockey team downs Plum after slow start
By Nathan Smith
Published: Wednesday, March 13, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Bishop Canevin hockey coach Kevin Zielmanski compared watching his squad's first two periods against Plum last week to watching someone stuck in quicksand — the harder they tried, the further they sank.
“If you try to do too much and get outside your comfort zone and you are not making the simple pass or simple play, you start making mistakes,” Zielmanski said. “And then they started compounding on one another, and the other team capitalizes and they gain confidence.”
The Crusaders were able to overcome sloppy play in the first two periods to record a 5-2 win over the Mustangs in the PHIL Class AA Penguins Cup quarterfinals.
Bishop Canevin scored first as Patrick Large sent the puck in from the right circle on a power play with 10:40 left to go in the first. Plum responded with 3:58 to go in the period as David Stonebraker snuck the puck past goalie Nikita Meskin to tie it up at 1-1.
A Plum penalty led to the second Bishop Canevin goal: Garrett Godlewski scored off a pass from Brennan Adams at the 9:43 mark of the second period. But less than a minute later, Plum's Joe Randazzo responded to tie it, 2-2.
“I told the team, ‘I don't know if Plum is good enough to win five in a row to win states, but I know they sure as heck can win tonight if we don't play well,' ” Zielmanski said
The Crusaders created some breathing room late in the period when Austin Large took the puck from the left side of the net to the right and scored past goalie Taylor Cestra.
“They were giving more effort than my guys,” Zielmanski said. “That was my message at intermission. The lack of effort was inexcusable. Even though we had the lead, we should of been losing. They were pursuing the pick with more effort than we were. I had one of my louder tirades, because the effort was poor.”
Bishop Canevin extended its lead to two early in the final period. Godlewski scored his second power-play goal of the night.
“I was able to find space,” Godlewski said. “Brennan Adams made a good, heads-up play on my first goal, and Austin Large did the same on the second.”
Austin Large scored on a breakaway with 10:29 to give the Crusaders a three-goal advantage.
Austin Large led the Crusaders with five points, including two goals and three assist. Adams recorded four assists.
Godlewski — who finished the regular season with seven goals and nine assists — had a strong night with two goals.
“It may have been better we had a tough game to start the playoffs,” Godlewski said. “If we blow a team out, we would go into the next game a little more easy-going. A tougher game like this helps us out and gets us ready.”
Bishop Canevin was able to make the most of its power-play opportunities, scoring goals on three of its six power plays.
Meskin recorded 24 saves.
It was the second game of the season between the squads; the Crusaders won, 7-0, on Nov. 1.
“Players have such a period of time that they can improve that what happens in November has little impact on now,” Zielmanski said. “The hockey season is so long. We started before basketball, and that has already ended except for states. The only thing those early games do is allow one team to be a little overconfident.”
The Crusaders faced Pine-Richland in the Penguins Cup semifinals Tuesday. Results were unavailable at press time.
Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 412-388-5813.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.