Share This Page

Kittanning hockey gets another shot at Quaker Valley

| Monday, March 11, 2013, 12:11 a.m.
Freeport's #62 Hunter Kepple attempts to take down Kittanning's #61 Elijah Johns as #79 Caroline Mundy charges ahead during the play-off game at the Belmont Complex in Kittanning on Thursday March 7, 2013. Erica Hilliard | Valley News Dispatch
Erica Hilliard | Valley News Dispatch
Freeport's Cole Hepler (middle) attempts to score past (from left) Kittanning's Michael Kelly, goalie Cameron Langham and Zane Wichowski during their playoff game on Thursday, March 7, 2013, at the Belmont Complex in West Kittanning.

If Kittanning is to reach the PIHL Class A Penguins Cup final, it'll need to accomplish what no team has since 2011: defeat Quaker Valley.

The two sides meet in the Penguins Cup semifinals at Robert Morris Island Sports Center on Monday at 8 p.m. The winner advances to the Penguins Cup finals March 20.

The undefeated, top-seeded Quakers last lost Nov. 3, 2011, 3-2, to rival Mars. Since then, they have gone 39-0-1 in regular season play — including a 22-0 mark this season — and captured the 2012 Penguins Cup and PA Cup in impressive fashion.

That 2012 postseason run included a 7-1 win over Kittanning the semifinals. So if anyone knows how difficult a task faces the No. 6 Wildcats, it is the Wildcats themselves.

“They're a good team; they're a very good team,” Kittanning coach Jamie King said. “Somebody's going to have to play their best to beat them.”

Kittanning came close in its last two shots at the Quakers, losing 3-2 in overtime Feb 22. and 5-2 Feb. 28. To put that into perspective: Quaker Valley beat teams by an average score of 7.8 to 0.9.

Still it was easy to see that play favored the shot-happy Quakers, who out-shot Kittanning, 109-42, over the two games.

“They shoot a ton,” King said. “But it wasn't like — you think ‘Oh my God we were never out of our end.' We had a lot of good chances, too.”

While the story for Kittanning much of the season has been the offensive display by underclassman forwards Christian Miller and Hunter Grafton — who sat 1-2 atop the Class A scoring charts with 82 and 81 points, respectively — it could be senior goaltender Cameron Langham upon whom the Wildcats rely most.

In the first of their two regular season games against Quaker Valley, Langham made an eye-popping 63 saves on 66 shots. Most recently, in the Penguins Cup quarterfinals against No. 3 Freeport, he stopped 23 of 25 shots in the 5-2 victory.

“Cam's very good,” King said. “But, you know, we expect that out of him.”

Where as Kittanning actually may have the best three players on the ice, it is Quaker Valley's depth and stingy defense that separates it from the pack.

Defensively, the Quakers surrendered 21 goals in 22 games. Mars had the second-stingiest defense with 43 goals against. Kittanning sat fourth with 65 goals against.

The Quakers boast five players who scored more than 50 points — easily tops in Class A. Kittanning and Serra Catholic were second, each with two players reaching the 50-point plateau.

“The first team that commits to defense is going to beat them. That's the first thing,” Miller said. “You've got to commit to team defense first and then offense.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.