ShareThis Page

PIHL semifinals roundup: Pine-Richland secures Penguins Cup upset in OT

| Tuesday, March 12, 2013, 10:12 p.m.
Bishop Canevin senior Matthew Bilski (left) battles for a puck with Pine Richland junior Nick Jenkins during the PIHL Class AA semifinals Tuesday, March 12, 2013, at Robert Morris University's Island Sports Center.
Randy Jarosz | For the Tribune-Review
Bishop Canevin senior Matthew Bilski (left) battles for a puck with Pine Richland junior Nick Jenkins during the PIHL Class AA semifinals Tuesday, March 12, 2013, at Robert Morris University's Island Sports Center.

Pine-Richland forward Dillon Kessey's overtime goal against Bishop Canevin in the Class AA Penguins Cup semifinals may have been the biggest of his career.

But the senior wasn't sure it was a goal initially.

“I didn't know it went in,” Kessey said. “I looked at the referee and saw his hand signal. I was so excited. I can't describe it. We lost in the quarterfinals when I was a sophomore and last year in the semifinals. To get this is huge for us.”

The goal gave the fourth-seeded Rams a 3-2 overtime win over the top-seeded Crusaders and punched their ticket to Consol Energy Center.

Kessey's goal did not come without controversy. During the battle in front of the net, the cage moved at some point, but the PIHL officials awarded the game-winner to Pine-Richland, causing Bishop Canevin coach Kevin Zielmanski to protest the call.

“The net moved,” Zielmanski said. “I didn't get an explanation. They just told me to get away.”

Bishop Canevin's Brennen Adams scored on a power play in the first period to give his squad the lead, but Pine-Richland responded with a power-play goal from Ryan Cole a minute later.

The Crusaders took the lead on Adams' second power-play goal in the second period.

But an unassisted Matthew Cole score tied it at 2-2 midway through the third and seemed to swing the momentum in favor of the Rams.

“I am so proud of these kids,” Pine-Richland coach Mike Bagnato said. “They played their hearts out tonight and found a way to win.”

It was the second game between the teams this season. Bishop Canevin defeated Pine-Richland, 2-1, in the season opener.

“It is always a competitive game with them,” Zielmanski said. “They have some talent and played tough. I don't think any of their goals were particularly good. They seemed to bounce off a skate to an open man.”

Kessey led Pine-Richland with two points. Goalie Brendan Bagnato recorded 28 saves.

Pine-Richland will look to win its first Penguins Cup since the 2008 season. The Rams won three straight titles from 2006-08 but have not been in the title game since.

“My captains are in (the locker room) crying because they are so happy,” Bagnato said. “A lot of these kids were freshmen and sophomores when I took over the program. We have had through a lot of ups and downs. We got to the semifinals last year.

“Now it is my job to make sure they are ready to win the championship.”

Latrobe hangs on

The Latrobe hockey team is making a return to the Class AA Penguins Cup title game.

The second-seeded Wildcats, who won the Cup from 2008-10, defeated third-seeded Chartiers Valley, 3-2, to punch their ticket to Consol Energy Center next week.

Christopher Johnson opened the scoring for Latrobe eight minutes into the first period.

Second-period goals from Adam Ferguson and Dalton Hunter gave Latrobe a three-goal lead heading into intermission.

The Colts responded in the third period with power-play goals from Robert Ferrari and Anthony Franks but were unable to get the equalizer despite a late-game rally.

Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or via Twitter @NSmith_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.