ShareThis Page

High school hockey roundup: Peters Township wins, reaches finals again

| Wednesday, March 13, 2013, 10:39 p.m.
Randy Jarosz
Bethel Park senior Austin Jameyson (left) battles for the puck with North Allegheny sophomore Dan Bostedo during the PIHL Class AAA semifinals Wednesday, March 13, 2013, at Robert Morris Island Sports Complex.

Facing the top-scoring team and the highest-scoring player he would all season, Peters Township goalie Brian Baker had support in front of him.

“The defense was very strong today,” Baker said Wednesday night outside the locker rooms at the RMU Island Sports Center. “I don't think I could have asked for better defense.”

The Indians couldn't have asked for better goaltending.

Keenan Witmer's second-period goal would be all Baker needed to post his second shutout of the season as Peters Township beat State College, 3-0, in a PIHL semifinal between Class AAA's two highest-scoring teams that produced little offense.

“What I said to the guys was this was a perfect kind of game to go into Consol on, knowing you can be in a game that's 1-0 with five minutes to go and still have the fortitude to pull it out,” Indians coach Rick Tingle said.

No. 1 seed Peters Township (19-4) advanced to a Penguins Cup title game for the third consecutive season. The Indians will play North Allegheny at 9 p.m. March 20 at Consol Energy Center.

Wednesday's game was very much in question until Alexander DeBolt scored with 3:06 to play in the third. Trevor Recktenwald earned an assist on that goal and added an empty-netter with 46.2 left. Linemate Adam Alavi assisted on both late goals for Peters Township, which has won 15 straight.

Baker improved his goals-against average to 2.15 and save percentage to .918. He stopped all 15 shots against No. 5 State College (16-8).

“ ‘Bakes' had a nice game,” Tingle said. “Our guys took care of some shots. The good part was we kept the shots outside. When we keep shots outside, no one's going to score on ‘Bakes.' ”

Baker twice stopped Stefan Horgas on partial breakaway attempts. Horgas was PIHL Class AAA's leader in goals and points during the regular season. Baker, perhaps, was at his best during that stretch, one in which he denied several Little Lions chances during a pair of power plays immediately after the Horgas breakaways.

NA completes comeback

Joe Griffin scored twice, and North Allegheny came back from a pair of one-goal deficits to defeat Bethel Park, 4-3, in the PIHL Class AAA semifinal nightcap Wednesday at the RMU Island Sports Center.

Griffin's rising wrist shot from a sharp angle low in the left-wing circle beat Austin McGinty and gave the Tigers their first lead with 11:19 to play. Griffin's first goal of the playoffs — his 20th on the season — came while short-handed, tying the game 2-2 late in the second.

Charlie Johnson scored earlier in the contest, and Cody Black had what proved to be the winner with 7:37 to play for No. 3 North Allegheny (17-4-2).

Chris Sisak scored twice — including with McGinty pulled for an extra attacker in the final minute — and Ryan Kusmira opened the scoring with a power-play goal for No. 2 seed and defending Penguins Cup champion Bethel Park (17-6).

A critical juncture of the game came when the Tigers' Griffin and Shawn Baird were penalized 12 seconds apart midway through the second.

Although Sisak scored 1:02 later during the resulting 5-on-3, Griffin's short-handed goal 39 seconds after that meant North Allegheny emerged from the Black Hawks' two-man advantage on even footing.

Chris Adamski is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.