Shaler hockey team learns from loss
TribLIVE Sports Videos
For the first period against Central Catholic, the Shaler hockey squad played nearly flawless.
“They did everything I had on my checklist,” said Shaler coach Curt Hetz.
“They were focused, disciplined, they skated and they shot.”
Shaler allowed one goal on a 2-on-1 break, but looked primed to continue the overall solid play into the second period.
But, as can happen in hockey, an error can swing the momentum in a big way, and unfortunately for Shaler, that happeneded, and that shift landed the Titans a 9-1 loss.
Hetz said that this year's team has a skill set that when played within the structure of the coaching staff's system can be successful.
However, when players step outside of the plan, the end result could be a loss.
“We had some guys try to do too much, a little more than they should,” Hetz said.
“I understand they are trying to help the team, or doing what they think will help the team, but there are certain strengths we don't have and we can not expose our weaknesses.”
Central Catholic got a quick goal in the second period, and that snowballed into a 5-0 lead midway through the second.
“It was a bad pass that led to that second goal and after that, our energy just dropped like a car getting a flat tire,” Hetz said. “It just took us too long to recover after that.”
Hetz said the positive that can be taken away is the first-period effort that saw the team play with focus and discipline.
Steven Cole Stayduhar scored the Titans goal on the evening, and the team will look to add more to the scoring effort when it takes the ice against Fox Chapel on Tuesday, Dec. 10 at 6:30 p.m. at Harmarville Bladerunners.
Jerry Clark is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.