High school roundup: Vikings, Scotties pick up wrestling victories
Tyler Lynch (106 pounds), Jake Virgin (120), Evan Myers (126) and Jorden Beltz (132) recorded pins to help the Southmoreland wrestling team post a 60-12 win over host Charleroi in a Section 2-AA (2B) match Wednesday.
Austin Griffiths (113), Sean Suter (152), Shane Cavanaugh (160), Brendon Coles (170), Dakota Datz (182) and Jake Beistel (heavyweight) each won by forfeit for the Scotties.
Mt. Pleasant 49, Derry 21— Mike Novak (126), Andy Yoder (138), Austin Mears (145) and Eli Holt (195) each won by fall as the Vikings (6-2, 2-1) won in a Section 2-AA (2B) match.
Ethan Charlesworth (152) and Justin Overly (182) were winners via technical fall.
Aldo Garcia (132), Bobby Long (160) and Austin Piper (170) each earned a decision, and Josh Lind (220) was awarded a forfeit victory.
Eden Christian Academy 62, Geibel 40 — Aaron Agostoni scored 15 points, and Tyler Schweiss added 12 points, but the Gators (0-5) lost to the visiting Warriors (8-1) in a nonsection game.
Connellsville 40, Laurel Highlands 35 — Corey Fogle scored 12 points, and Jim Cellurale added 11 to lead the Falcons (3-4). Duston Wiggins scored nine points, and Colby Shipley chipped in eight.
Hempfield 47, Connellsville 29 — Jim Cellurale scored 10 points, and Duston Wiggins scored six points, but the Falcons lost at the Laurel Highlands Tournament.
Connellsville 56, Charleroi 31— Colby Shipley scored 15 points, and Caleb Miller added 10 to lead the Falcons. Tyler Evans tallied seven points.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.