ShareThis Page

High School Notebook: Low numbers remain problem for Valley girls basketball program

Bill Beckner Jr.
| Sunday, Dec. 30, 2012, 8:12 p.m.

Valley's girls basketball program has been battling low roster numbers for the past few years, an issue it somehow has managed to work around, even making the playoffs with only six players in 2011.

But with postponements and forfeits piling up this season, and the schedule becoming more touch-and-go, the team faces challenges it may not be able to overcome.

Valley had only four players available for the Riverview Tournament, and had to forfeit both of its games the first day of the tournament. Riverview scrambled and had its junior varsity team play Carrick's varsity Friday.

Its junior varsity team wiped out, Valley (0-5) started the season with 10 girls. It's now down to seven, although coach Jeff Cheatham said up to four of the players appear to be on the fence in terms of commitment.

“We have a tough situation here, but we're staying positive,” Cheatham said. “We have girls who want to be on the team, but don't want to play in games. It's something I have never seen before.”

Other local teams have small numbers, too. But Valley's situation clearly is the most worrisome.

Burrell doesn't have a junior varsity team, either. But a consistent and talented seven-player roster has kept the varsity competitive.

“A lot of girls these days just aren't interested,” Cheatham said. “They have so many other things to do. I was always taught once you join something, start something, you finish it.”

Cheatham doesn't think the season is in jeopardy but plans to march ahead.

One positive is the return of a junior high program, which was absent last season. Still, participation is inconsistent, spotty at best.

And Cheatham said the youth program needs improvement.

“I thought we could have a really good team,” Cheatham said. “If we had the troops, we could pull it all together. We still have a season ahead of us.

“We need the support of parents and a community backing. I can tell you one thing: I am there every day. I am not going to quit on these girls.”

Deer Lakes football coach

It could be a month or more before Deer Lakes has a new head football coach in place. The district is just beginning the process to replace Todd Hazlett, whose position was opened in November.

Athletic director Chuck Bellisario said the school has received “a nice number” of applicants and will begin interviewing candidates.

Gardlock out

Valley's boys basketball team has played two-plus games without starter Tyler Gardlock, the team's second-leading scorer. Gardlock took an elbow to the head, blacked out and suffered a concussion early against Plum and did not return to that game. He also missed both games of the Riverview Tournament.

Gardlock will see a doctor again this week. Valley (2-6) has not started the same five players once this season.

Wrestling to watch

A wrestling showdown between two of the top teams in WPIAL Class AAA will take place Wednesday night in Allegheny Township. Kiski Area (8-0), ranked No. 3, will host No. 2 Franklin Regional (6-0) in a Section 1-AAA(A) match.

Franklin Regional has three No. 1-ranked individuals in Michael Kemerer (126), Josh Maruca (138) and Josh Shields (145). Kiski Area has two No. 1s in Matt McCutcheon (195) and Shane Kuhn (285).

Being Frank

Fox Chapel wrestling coach Ron Frank is nearing a milestone of sorts. He needs two wins for 350.

Frank, who has been the coach for 31 years, has a career record of 348-253-7.


A performance worth mentioning again: Leechburg basketball guard Ben Richie was brilliant in the consolation game of the Leechburg Tournament. He came off the bench to score 33 points, including eight 3-pointers. He scored 30 across the first three quarters, and 14 in the third. ... St. Joseph's boys basketball team did not make it to the championship game of its holiday tournament. The last time that happened? 1997.

Bill Beckner Jr. is a staff writer for TribTotal Media. He can be reached at 724-224-2696 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.