Share This Page

Pittsburgh Tribune-Review athletes of the week: Fox Chapel's Matt D'Amico, Woodland Hills' Desiree Garland

| Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Submitted
Woodland Hills basketball player Desiree Garland
Submitted
Fox Chapel basketball player Matt D'Amico.

Matt D'Amico

School: Fox Chapel

Year: Junior

Sport: Basketball

Claim to fame: D'Amico, one of the top scorers in the WPIAL, scored 18 points for the Foxes (10-3, 5-1) in their 40-38 loss to Gateway on Jan. 8. D'Amico scored 36 points — his third 30-plus point performance in four games — in a 73-59 victory against Penn Hills on Jan. 4. A three-year starter, D'Amico has scored at least 20 points in all but three games this season.

“He brings a strong work ethic in from the summer and into the fall and has been a good leader for us,” coach Zach Skrinjar said. “Offensively, he can shoot on the move, shoot off the dribble, knock down the three. ... When you put that combination down, that's what separates the good ones from great ones.”

What are you doing to have all this success?

It basically all started in the offseason. I've been going to the gym every day, lifting and conditioning.

Coach Skrinjar said your work ethic has played a huge part in your success. Would you agree?

For sure. In the offseason it's definitely tough. You're working every day. You just want to get better. So that helps in the season. You can definitely tell which player puts in the extra work and which one just does the minimum.

What can we expect to see when you've had another summer to improve?

Definitely my defense. It isn't one of my strengths now, but that will be great if I can improve on that for next season.

What will Fox Chapel have to do to maintain its current position in the section?

The first time around in the section is tough, but the second time is tougher. We're going to have to keep playing the way we're playing. You're definitely going to have to step it up because teams start to know your plays and strengths and weaknesses.

Desiree Garland

School: Woodland Hills

Year: Senior

Sport: Basketball

Claim to fame: Garland scored 14 points and eclipsed the 1,000-point mark for her career in the Wolverines' 58-46 loss to Franklin Regional on Jan. 11. Garland, averaging 17 points per game heading into the week, scored 12 points in the Wolverines?? 49-48 win over Norwin on Jan. 9 and had 15 in a 63-33 win over McKeesport on Jan. 4.

How special was it to reach the 1,000-point mark?

It's very special. I didn't even know that I was close until a week before that. My coach didn't want to tell me because she didn't want me to think about it too much.

What are your plans after high school?

I'm debating between running track and field or playing basketball. I'm not sure yet. I'll know in February. Pitt is the main school that I've heard from for track. That's where I want to go. I also heard from Seton Hill, Cal. U., and IUP.

Why are you opting for track over basketball?

Last year was the first time I ran track. I did really well. It just fits me better than basketball. I've gotten more letters from track and field, so it just seems like the better thing to do in the long run.

When you reflect on your four years at Woodland Hills, what moment will stand out?

When I played with my sister when I was a freshman and she was a senior. It was more fun to me because my sister was there. She helped me a lot. I don't think I would have been as good if she wasn't there my first year.

What do you have to do as a team to turn the season around?

We just need to come together as a team and work harder and support each other more.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.