Local roundup: Kittanning wrestling team wins Richland Duals
Kittanning is gearing up for the WPIAL team wrestling postseason.
The Wildcats on Saturday won the Richland Duals Tournament in Clearfield, posting a 5-0 record with four individuals going undefeated.
Kittanning dispatched Cambria Heights, 34-24, in the first round, followed by a 38-31 win over Somerset and a 39-27 win over United in the quarterfinals.
Kittanning easily disposed of Johnstown, 57-6, before winning a close, 33-31, match over Moshannon Valley in the finals.
Jason Nolf (132 pounds), Brendon Malia (106), Taylor Jack (152) and Jake Robb (170) each went 5-0 and Zac Croyle (195) went 4-1 for the Wildcats, who will open the Section 3-AA tournament Wednesday at South Allegheny.
“It's an awesome accomplishment for these guys. They put a lot of time in,” Kittanning coach Brandon Newill said.
Burgettstown Invitational — Highlands made just its second appearance of the season after suspending its team because of a shortage of wrestlers. Junior Allan Cratsenberg made his season debut, posting a third-place finish at 220 pounds. Teammate Nolan Wise took fifth at 138.
Cheswick Christian Academy 73, Evangel Heights 32 — Cheswick Christian (11-5, 5-0) extended its win streak to six games with a Southwest Christian Athletic Conference win over Evangel Heights (3-2) at Penn State New Kensington.
Tyler Knupp led Cheswick Christian with 15 points, Antoine Malloy added 14, and Andrew Maust and Ian Swartz had 12 each for the Chargers.
Cheswick Christian Academy 52, Evangel Heights 5 — Jacque Willis scored a game-high 15 points to lead Cheswick Christian (7-7) over Southwest Christian Athletic Conference opponent Evangel Heights. Cydney Francis added 10 points for the Chargers.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.