High school roundup: Latrobe boys top Connellsville
Mike Soforik led all scorers with 16 points as the Latrobe boys basketball team posted a 62-48 win over visiting Connellsville in a Section 1-AAAA game Friday. Ben Havrilla tallied 13 points, and Blake Reeping added 10 points for the Wildcats (12-8, 7-3).
Jade Maher and Trent Bauer each scored 11 points for the Falcons (6-14, 2-8).
Laurel Highlands 54, Yough 40 — Joe Pegg and Jake Mansberry each scored 15 points to lead the Mustangs (14-5, 9-1) to a Section 3-AAA win over host Yough. Nick Lancaster contributed 14 points.
Josh Sterner was the leading scorer for the Cougars (7-13, 4-7) with 13 points. Ben D'Amico and Kirk Brown followed with 11 and 10 points, respectively.
Charleroi 56, Frazier 41 — Ryan Konek and Matt Indorante each scored 14 points to help the Cougars (12-6, 10-2) knock off visiting Frazier in a Section 5-AA contest. Jim Diaz and Eric Johnson each scored 12 points.
Charles Manack and Vincent Bucci each scored 14 points for the Commodores (4-13, 2-9).
Carmichaels 62, Geibel 35 — Brandon Lawless tallied a game-high 33 points, and Sean Smoggie notched 10 points as the Mikes (15-4, 5-3) defeated host Geibel in Section 3-A. It was the 450th career victory for Carmichaels coach Don Williams.
Aaron Agostoni scored 19 points to lead the Gators (2-14, 1-6).
Boys freshman basketball
Connellsville 35, Mt. Pleasant 28 — Jim Cellurale scored 12 points, and Duston Wiggins added nine points as the Falcons (6-7) beat host Mt. Pleasant.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.